Regulatory Updates
When Congress passed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act in 2012 and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finalized Rule 506(c) of Regulation D in 2013, it fundamentally changed how private fund sponsors could market their offerings. For the first time in modern securities history, issuers were legally permitted to advertise their private placements publicly — a practice that had been banned for nearly 80 years under the Securities Act of 1933. The result was a new era of capital formation, but one governed by rules that many sponsors still misunderstand, misapply, or ignore at their peril.
Rule 506(c) under Regulation D grants issuers the right to engage in general solicitation — meaning they can advertise their offerings to the public through websites, social media, emails, webinars, podcasts, and paid advertising — provided that all actual investors are verified accredited investors. But with that privilege comes a compliance framework that is nuanced, actively enforced, and evolving. The SEC has issued guidance, no-action letters, and enforcement actions that together define the boundaries of what is permissible and what crosses the line.
This article is a comprehensive, practical guide for 506(c) sponsors — including real estate syndications, private equity funds, venture capital funds, hedge funds, and other alternative investment vehicles — on exactly what they can and cannot say and do when soliciting accredited investors under the new general solicitation rules. We cover permissible marketing language, prohibited claims, performance advertising compliance, digital marketing boundaries, and lessons learned from SEC enforcement actions.
General solicitation, in the context of securities law, refers to any broadly disseminated communication that advertises the availability of a securities offering to an undefined group of potential investors. Prior to the JOBS Act, general solicitation was strictly prohibited under Rule 502(c) of Regulation D, meaning private placements could only be marketed through pre-existing substantive relationships.
Rule 506(c), adopted by the SEC in July 2013 and effective September 23, 2013, created a new exemption that expressly permits general solicitation for private offerings, subject to two core conditions:
This means a 506(c) issuer can post on social media, run paid ads, publish press releases, speak at public conferences, maintain a public-facing website describing the offering, and send cold emails — all without violating the general solicitation prohibition. However, every marketing action must still comply with the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, including Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.
The SEC has consistently interpreted general solicitation broadly. According to SEC Release No. 33-9415, examples of general solicitation include:
Importantly, once a 506(c) issuer engages in any of the above activities, the offering is classified as a 506(c) offering — not a 506(b) — and the verification requirement applies to all investors in that offering.
Key Rule: You cannot "mix" exemptions. If you engage in general solicitation for an offering, you cannot also rely on 506(b)'s self-certification standard for any investor in that same offering. All investors must be independently verified.
The following marketing and advertising activities are generally permissible under Rule 506(c), provided that all content is accurate, non-misleading, and compliant with anti-fraud rules:
Issuers may maintain publicly accessible websites that describe their offerings, investment strategy, management team, and deal terms. This includes deal summary pages, fund overview documents, and investor inquiry forms. The key compliance requirement is that all representations made must be materially accurate and not omit material facts that would make the statements misleading.
According to SEC guidance in Release No. 33-9415, there is no restriction on the type of information that can be included on a public-facing offering website, so long as it is truthful and does not constitute a prospectus under the Securities Act.
506(c) sponsors may use Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and other social media platforms to promote their offerings. This includes organic posts, paid advertising campaigns, sponsored content, and influencer partnerships. Each post must be accurate, include appropriate disclosures, and not make any guarantees of returns or misleading performance claims.
Unlike 506(b), where issuers must have a substantive pre-existing relationship before discussing an offering, 506(c) issuers can send cold emails to prospective investors they have never met. This is one of the most powerful practical advantages of 506(c). Email campaigns must comply with the CAN-SPAM Act, including opt-out mechanisms and accurate sender identification, in addition to securities law requirements.
Issuers may appear on podcasts, host public webinars, speak at industry conferences, and conduct online information sessions that are open to the general public. When discussing an offering in these settings, all statements must be accurate, and issuers should avoid making specific return projections unless they can be substantiated and are accompanied by appropriate risk disclosures.
506(c) issuers may issue press releases announcing fund launches, capital raises, and deal closings, provided that such communications are accurate and do not omit material information. Third-party media coverage of an offering is also generally permissible, as the issuer is not responsible for independently published editorial content — though they should be careful about providing materials that could be reproduced inaccurately.
Issuers may share pitch decks, private placement memoranda (PPMs), executive summaries, and deal teasers with unverified prospects during the solicitation phase. However, before accepting any investment, all investors must complete the verification process. Sharing these materials does not itself require prior verification; only investment commitment triggers the verification requirement.
While Rule 506(c) expanded permissible marketing dramatically, a significant number of restrictions remain in place under the anti-fraud provisions of federal securities law. The following are categories of conduct that are explicitly or effectively prohibited:
The most common — and most dangerous — compliance violation in 506(c) marketing is promising, projecting, or implying guaranteed investment returns. Under Rule 156 of the Securities Act and the SEC's anti-fraud framework, any statement that implies a specific, assured financial outcome is prohibited unless it is (a) based on reasonable assumptions, (b) accompanied by a balanced presentation of risks, and (c) clearly labeled as a forward-looking projection rather than a guarantee.
Examples of prohibited language include:
Even qualified projections such as "we target 12–15% returns" must be accompanied by clear disclosures that projections are not guaranteed, past performance does not guarantee future results, and investors could lose their entire investment.
Presenting historical performance data is permissible, but it becomes fraudulent when it is cherry-picked, selectively presented, or lacks proper context. The SEC's 2022 Marketing Rule (Rule 206(4)-1) — which applies to registered investment advisers — provides a useful benchmark for best practices, even for exempt issuers. Under these standards:
While the Marketing Rule technically applies to registered investment advisers, the SEC has applied its underlying anti-fraud principles broadly to 506(c) issuers through enforcement actions.
Under Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Rule 10b-5, it is unlawful to omit material facts in connection with the offer or sale of securities if those omissions make other statements misleading. In the context of 506(c) marketing, this means:
Once a 506(c) general solicitation has occurred, the issuer cannot accept investments from non-accredited investors — even sophisticated ones — in that offering. This is an absolute prohibition. Accepting even a single non-accredited investor in a 506(c) offering destroys the exemption and potentially subjects the issuer to securities registration requirements and civil liability.
Under Rule 506(c), a simple investor checkbox stating "I am an accredited investor" does not satisfy the verification requirement. The SEC's guidance on verification requires that issuers take reasonable steps to independently verify accredited status, which typically includes reviewing tax returns, W-2s, brokerage statements, or obtaining written confirmation from a licensed attorney, CPA, broker-dealer, or registered investment adviser.
Enforcement Note: The SEC's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) has specifically flagged inadequate verification practices as a priority examination area for 506(c) issuers. Self-certification alone has been cited in multiple enforcement actions as a basis for loss of the 506(c) exemption.
Advertising past or projected performance is one of the most legally sensitive areas of 506(c) marketing. The SEC has articulated expectations through a combination of formal rules, interpretive guidance, and enforcement actions.
The controlling legal standard for performance advertising is whether the presentation, taken as a whole, would be materially misleading to a reasonable investor. This is not a bright-line test — it requires a facts-and-circumstances analysis. However, the SEC has provided enough guidance through enforcement actions to identify clear patterns of non-compliance.
When advertising past performance of prior deals or funds, 506(c) sponsors should include the following disclosures as a compliance baseline:
Projected returns — target IRRs, equity multiples, cash-on-cash returns — are frequently used in real estate syndication and fund marketing. These are not automatically prohibited, but they require:
Testimonials from past investors are a powerful marketing tool but carry significant compliance risk. Under the SEC's Marketing Rule framework and the anti-fraud provisions, testimonials must:
Digital marketing presents unique compliance challenges for 506(c) sponsors because content is often brief, fast-moving, and publicly accessible. The SEC has made clear that the medium does not change the legal standard — all statements in social media posts, paid ads, email campaigns, and online content are subject to the same anti-fraud framework as printed offering materials.
Key compliance principles for social media marketing include:
Paid advertising on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Google, and LinkedIn is permissible under Rule 506(c), but each platform also has its own advertising policies that govern financial services and investment products. Sponsors should be aware that:
Ad copy that is compliant with a platform's policies is not automatically compliant with the SEC's anti-fraud standards — the two frameworks operate independently.
Email campaigns to prospective accredited investors must comply with:
Public-facing websites may describe the offering, sponsor background, and investment thesis without restriction. However, sponsors should be careful to:
Understanding the distinction between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) is essential before launching any marketing campaign. The following table summarizes the key marketing-related differences:
| Marketing Activity | Rule 506(b) | Rule 506(c) |
|---|---|---|
| Public advertising (websites, ads, social) | ❌ Prohibited | ✅ Permitted |
| Cold email outreach to strangers | ❌ Prohibited | ✅ Permitted |
| Social media posts about the offering | ❌ Prohibited | ✅ Permitted |
| Investor self-certification for accreditation | ✅ Permitted (with reasonable belief) | ❌ Not sufficient alone |
| Non-accredited sophisticated investors allowed | ✅ Up to 35 | ❌ None permitted |
| Third-party accreditation verification required | ❌ Not required | ✅ Required for all investors |
| Paid advertising (Facebook, Google, etc.) | ❌ Prohibited | ✅ Permitted |
| Public conference presentations | ⚠️ Only to pre-existing relationships | ✅ Open audiences permitted |
| Performance advertising (with disclosures) | ✅ Permitted | ✅ Permitted (with disclosures) |
| Maximum number of investors | Unlimited accredited + up to 35 sophisticated | Unlimited (accredited only) |
The SEC has been active in bringing enforcement actions against 506(c) issuers that violate general solicitation rules and anti-fraud provisions. Understanding these cases provides practical guidance on where the boundaries are.
A review of SEC Litigation Releases from 2018–2025 reveals recurring themes in enforcement actions against private offering sponsors:
SEC enforcement actions for 506(c) marketing violations can result in:
"Issuers relying on Rule 506(c) must understand that the ability to generally solicit does not relieve them of their obligation to provide investors with complete and accurate information. The anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws apply with full force to all communications made in connection with a general solicitation." — SEC Office of Small Business Policy FAQ on General Solicitation
Before publishing any marketing material — whether a social media post, email, landing page, paid ad, or pitch deck — 506(c) sponsors should run through the following compliance checklist:
Under Rule 506(c), general solicitation may begin before the Form D is filed, but the Form D must be submitted to the SEC within 15 days of the first sale of securities in the offering. You may advertise and solicit interest prior to any sale, but the 15-day filing clock starts upon the first investor closing. Some legal practitioners recommend filing a Form D promptly after beginning solicitation as a matter of best practice, even though the rule technically only requires filing after the first sale. See SEC Form D guidance for full details.
No. Describing any private securities offering as "safe," "no risk," "guaranteed," or "risk-free" is prohibited under the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws regardless of the offering structure. All private investments carry risk of loss, and marketing materials must accurately reflect that. Including such claims — even in passing — can expose the issuer to SEC enforcement action and private civil liability from investors. The SEC has brought enforcement actions specifically targeting these types of claims. See SEC Litigation Releases for examples.
There is no explicit SEC rule requiring a full risk disclosure paragraph in every single social media post. However, any post that makes a specific performance claim, quotes a return figure, or describes the investment opportunity in a way that could mislead investors must be accurate and not omit material information that would make the statement misleading in context. A brief disclaimer such as "Investments involve risk. See offering documents for details." is commonly used and represents a reasonable compliance approach for short-form content. The full risk disclosures should always be present in the linked offering materials.
Yes, but with significant caveats. An issuer may convert an ongoing 506(b) offering to a 506(c) offering if it has not yet completed the raise, but all investors — including those who invested under the 506(b) exemption — must be retroactively verified as accredited investors. The issuer must also file an amended Form D indicating the change in exemption used. Additionally, any general solicitation activities must occur after the decision to switch to 506(c) — you cannot retroactively claim 506(c) protection for solicitation that occurred before the switch. Legal counsel should be consulted before making this transition.
Testimonials from investors are generally permissible under Rule 506(c) as long as they are accurate, not materially misleading, and include appropriate disclosures. Key requirements include: (1) the testimonial must reflect the investor's genuine experience; (2) if the investor was compensated or received a benefit for providing the testimonial, that relationship must be disclosed; and (3) the testimonial must include a disclaimer indicating that it is not representative of all investors' experiences. Presenting a single exceptional outcome as typical of all investors would constitute a misleading omission.
Under Rule 502(d) of Regulation D and related SEC guidance, issuers conducting a 506(c) offering must maintain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the exemption. For general solicitation materials, this includes copies of all advertisements, social media posts, emails, pitch decks, landing pages, and any other communications directed at potential investors. These records should be retained for at least five years from the date of the offering's completion. An organized compliance file — including date-stamped versions of all materials — is strongly recommended and will be critical in any SEC examination or enforcement proceeding.
Projected returns may be referenced in paid ads, but doing so carries significant compliance risk if not handled carefully. Any projected return figure must be clearly labeled as a projection or target — not a guaranteed outcome — and should be accompanied by risk disclosures even in short-form ad copy. The linked landing page or offering materials must contain full risk disclosures and the assumptions underlying the projection. Given the character limitations of many ad formats, many sponsors elect to reference investment opportunities in ads without specific return figures, reserving projections for detailed offering materials shared with qualified prospects. Legal review of ad copy is highly recommended before running any campaign that includes projected financial figures.
Rule 506(c) offers 506(c) sponsors a powerful and legally sound path to broad-based investor marketing — one that can dramatically expand the pool of accredited investors you reach compared to the traditional 506(b) approach. The general solicitation rules, properly understood and applied, are not a maze of restrictions but rather a clear framework: be truthful, disclose risks, verify investors, and keep records. Sponsors who internalize these principles can market confidently across digital channels, paid advertising, social media, and public events without fear of regulatory exposure.
The sponsors who get into trouble are rarely those who made an honest mistake — they are those who made unsupportable claims, promised returns they couldn't substantiate, or skipped verification because it seemed burdensome. The SEC's enforcement record makes clear that these shortcuts carry severe consequences.
As you build your compliant marketing program, remember that compliance is not the ceiling — it's the foundation. A marketing strategy built on accurate representations, proper disclosures, and verified investors will outperform a non-compliant one in the long run, because it builds the institutional credibility and investor trust that drive repeat commitments and referrals.
Navigating 506(c) compliance while marketing your offering requires real expertise. Kruzich Media offers compliant lead generation solutions for sponsors conducting general solicitation under Rule 506(c), helping you reach verified accredited investors through targeted advertising campaigns that stay on the right side of the rules.
By clicking on "Sign me up", you agree to our
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Innovation
Fresh, creative solutions.

Integrity
Honesty and transparency.

Excellence
Top-notch services.
By clicking on "Sign me up", you agree to our
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright 2026. AccreditedInvestorLeadGeneration.com. All Rights Reserved.